Does Qandil have the right to amend the constitution?

Nouran El-Behairy
3 Min Read
Prime Minister Hisham Qandil on Tuesday announced upcoming changes in the constitution sparking a debate on the legality of such action in Egypt (AFP Photo)
Prime Minister Hisham Qandil on Tuesday announced upcoming changes in the constitution sparking a debate on the legality of such action in Egypt (AFP Photo)
Prime Minister Hisham Qandil on Tuesday announced upcoming changes in the constitution sparking a debate on the legality of such action in Egypt
(AFP Photo)

Statements made by Prime Minister Hesham Qandil regarding amending the constitution have raised questions about whether it was legal for the government to amend the constitution.

Qandil had announced on Monday in a meeting with a group of Egyptian expatriates in Kenya that his government has commissioned a number of constitutional experts to draft amendments of at least 10 articles of the constitution.

“Constitutionally, Qandil doesn’t have the right to call for amending the constitution unless he is advised to do so by the president and if that was true then the president admits the constitution is faulty,” said Constitutional Expert Raafat Fouda.

Article 217 of the Egyptian constitution that was passed in December states that both the president and the parliament have the right to request the amendment of one or more articles of the constitution; the request should include the articles to be amended and the reasons for amendment. If the request came from the parliament then at least 20% of its members have to sign it.

Qandil had announced that the amendments will be presented to President Mohamed Morsi; however, he added that he can’t guarantee the amendments will be approved by an elected parliament.

“He’s preparing amendments to be submitted to the next parliament and that’s not illegal,” Fouda said adding that Qandil is using the same people who drafted the constitution or people with similar ideologies. “He should have used those who opposed the constitution for amendments because if the people he chose knew better, they would have produced a better constitution from the first place.”

Fouda added that he believed Qandil’s statements were just to show goodwill to the opposition. “The opposition’s condition to participate in the parliamentary elections was to amend the constitution and this explains Qandil’s move,” Fouda said.

The constitution was passed by popular referendum in December amid a wave of objections from the opposition and calls to boycott the referendum; they believed the draft constitution lacked the basic requirements of consensus and will lead to limiting freedoms. NGOs and human rights organisations in Egypt have reported several violations during the referendum.

Share This Article
News Reporter