Reading Mona Eltahawy s opinion article, I will stand up for the Muslim Brotherhood (which ran in Daily News Egypt on Oct. 10) I felt that all Egyptians – regardless of their ideological orientation, gender or age – have a lot in common. Eltahawy and I differ on much, yet we share a common objective and we struggle for the same cause of bringing real democracy, justice and freedom to Egypt.
Eltahawy is critical of the Muslim Brotherhood s political orientation and stances on a number of issues, yet she stands with us in solidarity against the Egyptian government s crackdowns. It is important that Egyptians of different political views defend each other s political rights, as Eltahawy has done – and as several Muslim Brotherhood members, myself included, have previously done on behalf of opposition leaders Ayman Nour and Talaat El Sadaat and bloggers Kareem Amer and Sandmonkey.
But this is not the only point on which we agree.
In her opinion article, Eltahawy criticizes the Brotherhood leader Mohammed Mahdi Akef for calling her naked because she was wearing a short-sleeved T-shirt and pants. I couldn’t agree more with her.
Not wearing the hijab, or headscarf, makes a woman unveiled, not naked. I realize how offensive it is to call someone naked for not wearing a headscarf, and I find Akef s comment unjustifiable.
To be clear, I support Akef s stance on wearing the hijab, and like him I view it as a religious obligation. There has been consensus on that among Islamic scholars for centuries.
Yet this has nothing to do with the Muslim Brotherhood as a political group. While we believe that wearing the hijab is an obligation, we believe it is an individual woman s choice to observe it – a choice in which the state should not interfere.
There is a difference between what proponents of political Islam and Muslims in general regard as correct, and what they regard as enforceable by the state. This difference has unfortunately been blurred by the misguided practices of some contemporary Islamic systems, and in order to clear up any misconceptions, the literature of moderate scholars of political Islam needs to be scrutinized further.
Where I do disagree with Eltahawy is on the Muslim Brotherhood s commitment to democracy, which she calls into question. Akef s refusal to recognize different interpretations of Quranic verses concerning women s dress makes Eltahawy cynical about his ability to accept pluralism.
Not accepting another interpretation as authentic, however, does not mean attempting to silence it.
Every person is entitled to believe in the correctness or incorrectness of an idea, but he or she has no right whatsoever to enforce that belief on others. Akef, who told Eltahawy there are no other interpretations of the verse, never tried to force his beliefs on her.
As she herself writes, in 2005 she walked into the Muslim Brotherhood s headquarters and no one asked her to wear a headscarf as they had done when she visited the offices a decade earlier. This should give a strong indication of the positive changes taking place within the Muslim Brotherhood.
More importantly, acceptance of political pluralism is much easier than accepting pluralism in text interpretation. In the world of politics, sharia only sets objectives to be achieved and core values to be taken into account. This leaves much room for dynamism, and pluralism even among political Islamic lines of thought.
We understand the rules of democracy, and realize that people have the right to choose to do whatever they want, even if we view their choice as incorrect. At the end of the day, what matters should be neither the Muslim Brotherhood leaders opinion nor that of President Hosni Mubarak, but rather the Egyptian people s opinion, as manifested in ballot boxes in free and fair elections – given that their decision does not undermine the basic rights or civil liberties of any group or individual.
I agree with Eltahawy when she writes that the Muslim Brotherhood is the last man standing in Egypt. I sincerely believe this puts an additional responsibility on the group, as it must shoulder the burden of helping others to stand.
As declared several times by leaders including Deputy Chairman Khayrat El Shatir (who is currently being tried by a military tribunal), the Muslim Brotherhood realizes that no single party or group will be able to solve Egypt s economic, political and social problems. It is for this specific reason that Brotherhood members need to hear constructive criticism and advice from their political rivals, so we can all help each other move forward in pushing for genuine reform in Egypt.
I wholeheartedly salute the positive spirit exhibited in Eltahawy s opinion article. I salute her pragmatism; I salute her willingness to overcome ideological disputes and work with political rivals for a common cause and I salute her uncompromising position on human rights and her defense of freedom for all.
It is through this kind of spirit that dialogue becomes fruitful – and it is such spirit that makes one confidently say that we are capable of standing up united for Egypt.
Ibrahim El Houdaibyis a Cairo-based board member of Ikhwan Web, the Muslim Brotherhood s English-language web site. This article is distributed by the Common Ground News Service (CGNews) and can be accessed at www.commongroundnews.org. This article originally appeared in The Forward (www.forward.com), America s national Jewish newspaper.
