What are Egypt’s chances of gaining UNSC non-permanent seat?

Marwa Al-A'sar
14 Min Read
Egypt to applied for North Africa candidacy on UN Security Council. (AFP/File Emmanuel Dunand)
Egypt has been garnering the support of United Nations member states to approve its candidacy for a non-permanent seat in the UN Security Council (UNSC). (AFP/File  Emmanuel Dunand)
Egypt has been garnering the support of United Nations member states to approve its candidacy for a non-permanent seat in the UN Security Council (UNSC).
(AFP/File Emmanuel Dunand)

Egypt has been garnering the support of United Nations member states to approve its candidacy for a non-permanent seat in the UN Security Council (UNSC). Acquiring that seat will add to Egypt’s status and impact regionally. But what are Egypt’s chances of winning membership? And why is Egypt seeking this position at this point in time?

A country’s ability to preserve international peace and security as well as its geographic location are among the conditions for attaining membership in the UNSC.

Egypt held a non-permanent seat at the council four times since it was established in 1945. The country’s last membership in the Security Council was in 1997.

“We have made the decision long ago that it is our turn to acquire a membership in the UNSC…Egypt is seeking to represent North Africa,” said Ambassador Badr Abdelatty, spokesman of the foreign ministry.

Abdelatty believes it’s the perfect time for Egypt to attain UNSC membership.

“Egypt has restored its regional role… [it has an impact on several countries] besides taking part in peacekeeping operations, factors that will be [considered] by the Security Council,” Abdelatty said.

According to Abdelatty, after Egypt had an influential role in resolving the recent Gaza-Israel conflict, “the world realised that Egypt is the only country capable of preserving peace in the region.”

In August, Egypt negotiated an open-ended ceasefire agreement between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas faction that ended a seven-week war against the Gaza Strip.

However, Nabil Abdel-Fattah, senior researcher at Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, begs to differ.

“Seeking out a non-permanent seat in the UNSC is an attempt to improve Egypt’s image after the recent political disturbance, the distortion of Egypt by the western media…and the fierce criticism by the US, Europe, and other countries in the region of the political changes in Egypt following 30 June  [2013],” Abdel-Fattah said.

“This pursuit is not new as, since the era of [ousted president Hosni] Mubarak, Egypt has been trying to acquire a UNSC seat,” he added.

Abdel-Fattah added that Egypt is currently facing difficulties and serious consequences following the 30 June 2013 nationwide protests and the army’s removal of president Mohamed Morsi.

Last week, President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi expressed in his speech before the UN General Assembly Egypt’s aspiration to win a seat within the UNSC.

Al-Sisi said that Egypt’s wish is part of a desire to protect the interests of developing countries, particularly in Africa. He invited member states to support Egypt’s candidacy.

“Al-Sisi seized the opportunity of being at the UN and spoke in his speech about the new, strong Egypt, counter-terrorism, and democracy [in order to promote] Egypt’s chances to get elected,” said Hassan Nafaa, professor of political science at Cairo University.

“I believe there is a great opportunity for Egypt to win a UNSC seat, especially if stability and security are further achieved in the country,” he added.

Egypt seeks to attain membership in the round to start in January 2016.

The council members are elected by the UN 193-member general assembly. The elections are due in October 2015.

“Egypt is member in the Afro-Asian group which should agree on its nomination; then the General Assembly selects the winning countries,” added Nafaa. “If the group disapproves the candidacy of a certain country, the General Assembly is the entity that resolves this disagreement.”

Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry has been lobbying the support of his counterparts for Egypt’s nomination. On Sunday, the foreign ministry said in a statement on its official website that Shoukry handed his counterparts during the UN meeting a booklet on Egypt’s regional and international role and the activities and events it takes part in as to preserving world peace and security.

As a founding member of the UN, Egypt has been involved in efforts by the UN and regional organisations to promote peace in conflict areas, including Africa, the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America.

Egypt has been supporting the UN peacekeeping operations since the establishment of the first mission in 1948. Egypt currently provides 2,659 military and police personnel who serve under the UN in nine peace missions. Egypt has been involved in most UN activities in the political, economic and social spheres as well as in UN peacekeeping operations in several countries, including Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Abdelatty is optimistic about the outcome, believing that Egypt will not face the rejection of any country.

“In all the meetings the foreign minister held, the countries showed support for Egypt…they see Egypt as the main [catalyst] of stability in the region…where terrorism and chaos spread,” he added.

Yet Abdel-Fattah has another opinion.

“I think that there will be struggles over the UNSC seat by other influential countries in Africa such as South Africa, Nigeria, and Ethiopia,” he said. “These countries may even garner support for other countries to divert the attention from Egypt.” Abdel-Fattah said that other strong candidates include Nigeria and Morocco.

Nevertheless, Abdel-Fattah said there might be a glimmer of hope if “the political system in Egypt is reshaped.”

“It will be like a state of political nostalgia…going back to the role Egypt used to play [in the past],” he said.

It is believed that the policy influence is the most important reason for a state to seek a UNSC membership, even though there are some exceptions where a country competes for a seat in order to promote a particular cause.

But what if Egypt’s candidacy is rejected?

“It will add to the accumulation of frustration towards the political performance of Egypt over the past few years,” Abdel-Fattah said, adding that the Egypt’s position will likely be supported by Saudi Arabia and other countries in the Gulf, excluding Qatar.

UNSC takes the lead in determining the existence of a threat to the peace or act of aggression. It demands the parties to a dispute to settle it by peaceful means and recommends means of adjustment or terms of settlement.

In some cases, the council may resort to imposing sanctions or even authorise the use of force to sustain or restore international peace and security.

UNSC also recommends to the General Assembly the appointment of the secretary general and the admission of new members to the United Nations.

Moreover, together with the General Assembly, UNSC elects the judges of the International Court of Justice.

In October 2013, Saudi Arabia rejected a non-permanent seat in the Security Council even though it was elected to win it.

The kingdom justified its decision by saying that the previous pursuits that to end wars and disputes around the world did not result in the desired outcome, including the Palestinian cause.

UNSC non-permanent (elected) members from 1946 – 2016:

Terms in UNSCMember States
 1946- 1947

 

Australia, Brazil, Egypt (1946 only), Mexico(1946 only), Netherlands(1946 only) and Poland

 

 1947- 1948

 

Belgium, Colombia and Syria
 1948- 1949

 

Argentina, Canada and The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic
 1949- 1950

 

Cuba, Egypt and Norway
 1950- 1951

 

Ecuador, India and Yugoslavia
 1951- 1952

 

Brazil, Netherlands and Turkey
 1952- 1953

 

Chile, Greece and Pakistan
 1953- 1954

 

Colombia, Denmark and Lebanon
 1954- 1955

 

Brazil, New Zealand and Turkey
 1955- 1956

 

Belgium, Iran and Peru
 1956- 1957

 

Australia, Cuba, Iraq, Yugoslavia (1956 only – resigned)
 1957- 1958

 

Colombia, Philippines (1957 only) and Sweden
 1958- 1959

 

Canada, Japan and Panama
 1959- 1960Argentina, Italy and Tunisia
 1960- 1961

 

Ecuador, Poland (1960 only – resigned) and Ceylon (Sri Lanka)
 1961- 1962

 

Turkey (1961 only)
 1961- 1962

 

Chile, United Arab Republic (Egypt), Liberia (1961 only – resigned) and Turkey (1961 only)
 1962- 1963

 

Ghana, Ireland (1962 only), Venezuela and Romania (1962 only – resigned)
 1963- 1964

 

Brazil, Morocco, Norway and Philippines (1963 only)
 1964- 1965Bolivia, Côte d’Ivoire and Czechoslovakia (1964 only – resigned)
 1965- 1966

 

Jordan, Malaysia*, Netherlands and Uruguay
 1966- 1967

 

Argentina, Bulgaria, Japan, Mali, New Zealand (1966 only), Nigeria and Uganda (1966 only)
 1967- 1968Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Ethiopia and India
 1968- 1969

 

Algeria, Hungary, Pakistan, Paraguay and Senegal
 1969- 1970

 

Colombia, Finland, Nepal, Spain and Zambia
 1970- 1971

 

Burundi, Nicaragua, Poland, Sierra Leone and Syria
 1971- 1972

 

Argentina, Belgium, Italy, Japan and Somalia
 1972- 1973

 

Guinea, India, Panama, Sudan and Yugoslavia
 1973- 1974

 

Australia, Austria, Indonesia, Kenya and Peru
 1974- 1975

 

Belarus, Cameroon, Costa Rica, Iraq and Mauritania
 1975- 1976

 

Guyana, Italy, Japan, Sweden and Tanzania
 1976- 1977

 

Benin, Libya, Pakistan, Panama and Romania
 1977- 1978

 

Canada, Germany, India, Mauritius and Venezuela
 1978- 1979

 

Bolivia, Gabon, Kuwait, Nigeria and Czechoslovakia
 1979- 1980

 

Bangladesh, Jamaica, Norway, Portugal and Zambia
 1980- 1981

 

German Democratic Republic, Mexico, Niger, Philippines and Tunisia
 1981- 1982Ireland, Japan, Panama, Spain and Uganda
 1982- 1983Congo, Guyana, Jordan, Poland and Togo
 1983- 1984

 

Malta, Netherlands, Nicaragua and Pakistan
 1984- 1985

 

Burkina Faso, Egypt, India, Peru and Ukraine
 1985 -1986

 

Australia, Denmark, Madagascar, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago
 1986- 1987

 

Bulgaria, Congo, Ghana, UAE and Venezuela
 1987- 1988

 

Argentina, Germany, Italy, Japan and Zambia
 1988- 1989

 

Algeria, Brazil, Nepal, Senegal and Yugoslavia
 1989- 1990

 

Canada, Colombia, Ethiopia, Finland and Malaysia
 1990- 1991

 

Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Romania, Yemen and Zaire
 1991- 1992

 

Austria, Belgium, Ecuador, India and Zimbabwe
 1992- 1993

 

Cape Verde, Hungary, Japan, Morocco and Venezuela
 1993- 1994

 

Brazil, Djibouti, New Zealand, Pakistan and Spain
 1994- 1995

 

Argentina, Czech Republic, Nigeria, Oman and Rwanda
 1995- 1996

 

Botswana, Germany, Honduras, Indonesia and Italy
 1996- 1997

 

Chile, Egypt, Guinea-Bissau, Poland and Korean Republic
 1997- 1998

 

Costa Rica, Japan, Kenya, Portugal and Sweden
 1998- 1999

 

Bahrain, Brazil, Gabon, Gambia and Slovenia
 1999- 2000

 

Argentina, Canada, Malaysia, Namibia and Netherlands
 2000- 2001

 

Bangladesh, Jamaica, Mali, Tunisia and Ukraine
2001-2002

 

Colombia, Ireland, Mauritius, Norway and Singapore
2002-2003

 

Bulgaria, Cameroon, Guinea, Mexico and Syria
2003-2004

 

Angola, Chile, Germany, Pakistan and Spain
2004-2005

 

Algeria, Benin, Brazil, Philippines and Romania
2005-2006

 

Argentina, Denmark, Greece, Japan and United Republic of Tanzania
2006-2007

 

Congo, Ghana, Peru, Qatar and Slovakia
2007-2008Belgium, Indonesia, Italy, South Africa and Panama
2008-2009

 

Burkina Faso, Costa Rica, Croatia, Libya and Vietnam
2009-2011

 

Austria, Japan, Mexico, Turkey and Uganda
2010-2012

 

Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Gabon, Lebanon and Nigeria
2011-2013

 

Colombia, Germany, India, Portugal and South Africa
2012-014

 

Azerbaijan, Guatemala, Morocco, Pakistan and Togo
2014-2015Argentina, Australia, Luxembourg, Republic of Korea and Rwanda
2014-2016Chad, Chile, Jordan, Lithuania and Nigeria

 

 

Share This Article