Iran and Saudi Arabia are stoking the denominational conflict between Sunnis and Shias. Both sides are attempting to exploit an inner-Islamic conflict that has been raging for more than 1,300 years.
The words used by Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei were harsh. Following the execution of Shia cleric Nimr Baqr al-Nimr he threatened that: “The unjustly spilled blood of this oppressed martyr will with no doubt show its effect and divine vengeance will befall Saudi politicians.”
Like many religious scholars in Iran, Khamenei wears a black turban as a symbol of filiation with the family of the Islamic prophet Mohammed. The Saudi royal family also invokes Mohammed and Islam.
However, Shia Iran and Sunni Saudi Arabia are also rivals for political supremacy in the Middle East. In this rivalry, both sides seek to tie political goals to religious interpretations. Within such a context, the execution of al-Nimr appears to be just one more episode in the long history of an inner-Islamic power struggle.
Fight over the Prophet’s successor
The division of Islam into the branches of Sunni and Shia arose from a battle over the rightful successor to the prophet Mohammed. When the Islamic prophet died in the year 632 AD, his followers had to choose his religious and political successor.
Shias believed that Mohammed had chosen his son-in-law Ali to be that successor. The designation Shia comes from the Arabic “Shi’atu Ali,” or followers of Ali.
The group known as Sunnis today, rejected the claim and prevailed. The term Sunnah refers to the ideal of the actions and utterances of the Prophet Mohammed.
Shias in the minority
Both the Sunnis and the Shias split into further groups over the course of the centuries. Shias represent only 10 to 15 percent of the world’s 1.5 billion Muslims, yet they represent a majority in the Gulf states of Iran, Iraq and Bahrain. The two million or so Shia that live in the oil-rich province of Saudi Arabia, however, are a much-bullied minority. Sunnis themselves are not a unified block and consist of a great number of different groups.
There are, nonetheless, many religious similarities among all groups on both sides of the divide. The Five Pillars of Islam – Testimony, Prayer, Fasting, Pilgrimage to Mecca and Alms-giving, are practically identical among all denominations, although they vary greatly in their details.
A significant difference between the Sunni and Shia branches of Islam are their individual relationships to power. Throughout history, the Shia have mostly been a discriminated minority. That has shaped their theology. Revolts against Sunni caliphs, considered illegitimate by the Shia, have played a central role in that theology.
In 680 AD, Ali’s son Hussein died during such a revolt. Each year Shiites recall his death by reenacting passion plays during the feast of Ashura. This commemoration is also kept alive in today’s conflicts. For instance, Hussein’s willingness to die on the battlefield was held up as a role model during Iran’s war against Iraq from 1980 to 1988.
Seemingly centuries old conflict
Sunni and Shia also faced off against one another in the wars fought between the Sunni Ottoman Empire and the Shia Shah of Persia, today’s Iran. Just how important these denominational differences and the historical references connected to them are in mobilizing large sections of the population can be seen in the proxy wars being carried out by Iran and Saudi Arabia today. Iran supports, above all, non-Sunni groups in the civil wars taking place in Syria and Yemen. Whereas the Saudis have forged alliances with predominantly Sunni states.
But beyond the religious propaganda, there are in fact many examples of peaceful coexistence. Representatives from both branches have often attempted to bridge their religious divides. In 1959, Mahmud Shaltut, then rector of the Egyptian Al-Azhar University, declared that Shia religious practices were equal to those of Sunni Islam. Al-Azhar University is considered to be the most prestigious of all places of Sunni scholarship.
Scholars’ joint declaration
In 2005, King Abdullah ll of Jordan organized an Islamic conference which brought together Sunni and Shia scholars. These scholars agreed that both branches are in fact Muslim. “To declare someone as an apostate (non-believer) is neither possible nor permissible,” said their joint statement, later known as the Three Points of the Amman Message.
The now deceased King Abdallah of Saudi Arabia was also a signatory of the declaration. Nevertheless, that has not kept preachers in the kingdom from declaring Shia as infidels. The leaders of the Sunni extremist militia “Islamic State” as well as other Sunni Islamists continue to do so as well.
On the other hand, thousands of Shiites volunteer as mercenaries because they feel that their religion is under threat. Islam does not have a superior religious authority that could put an end to the exploitation of these differences.
Have something to say? Add your comment below. The thread to this editorial closes in 24 hours.
