A new study, published by Royal Society Open Science, shed light on the origin and evolution of European sign languages. Using phylogenetic network methods to compare dozens of sign languages, researchers identified five main European sign language lineages that dispersed to other parts of the world since the late 18th century.
Natural human languages come in two main types; based on the modality in which they are expressed and perceived: spoken languages in the oral-aural modality and signed languages in the gestural-visual modality. Although spoken languages and their histories have received the majority of scientific attention, researchers assume that signing, while far less studied, is at least as ancient as speech. “While the evolution of spoken languages has been studied for more than 200 years, research on sign language evolution is still in its infancy,” said Justin Power, first author of the study.
“Much of what we know about the history of contemporary sign languages came from historical accounts of contact between deaf educational institutions and educators. We wanted to know if a comparison of sign languages using contemporary and historical sources could shed light on how European sign languages developed and spread around the world,” he added.
Many of the world’s sign languages included a set of manual forms representing a written alphabet, which signers use to spell written words using a sequence of handshapes. Historical examples of such manual alphabets can be found for many sign languages dating back to the establishment of educational institutions for the deaf during the European Enlightenment.
To conduct the study, the researchers began by building an annotated database of 40 contemporary and 36 historical manual alphabets. They then compared the manual alphabets using phylogenetic network methods, which could show varying degrees of relation between many languages at the same time. This allowed them to visualise and understand the complex connections between languages without assuming a priori of commonalities between languages are simply due to common inheritance, as it would be suggested by phylogenetic tree methods.
“For this study, we created the largest cross-linguistic comparative database of sign languages available,” said Johann-Mattis List, another author of the study. “The database helped us track the evolution of sign languages over the past few centuries, providing a clearer picture about the roots of the contemporary diversity of the world’s sign languages.”
By adapting methods from historical linguistics and evolutionary biology, the team of scientists was able to infer likely relationships among sign languages. “Despite dealing with fundamentally different data, the analogies between the evolution of sign languages and biological evolution are striking, especially when we look at the gain and loss of lineage-specific traits”, said Guido Grimm, the team’s phylogeneticist.
The researchers were able to group the sign languages in the study into five main evolutionary lineages, similar to the usage of phylogenetic networks created in genetic research, revealing how the languages changed as they spread across Europe and into other parts of the world.
Power said, “The network methods allowed us to analyse in detail the complex evolution of complete lineages, manual alphabets, and individual handshapes.”
“Integrating these methods with our research into historical manual alphabets gives us a powerful framework for understanding the evolution of sign languages.”
The study’s results confirmed many of the sign language dispersal events known from the historical record, but the results also turned up several surprises. For instance, the study confirmed the influence of French Sign Language on deaf education and signing communities in many regions, including in Western Europe and the Americas, which researchers previously emphasised.
However, in addition to confirming these connections, the current study highlighted the dispersal of Austrian Sign Language to central and northern Europe, as well as to Russia – a lineage about which little was previously known. “We were very excited about our findings,” said Power.
He added, “Our interdisciplinary approach combined traditional scholarship with computational phylogenetic methods, and gave us new keys for understanding the evolutionary histories of the world’s sign languages.”
